International Center University of Florida

Relevant Citations

• Adame, F. (2021). Meaningful collaborations can end ‘helicopter research’. Nature, 10. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01795-1
• Arnold, J. S., & Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2010). Engaging communities through participatory research. In Forest Community Connections (pp. 78-100). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781936331451-10/amenity-migration-rural-communities-public-lands-linda-kruger-rhonda-mazza-maria-stiefel
• Arnold, J., & Bartels, W. L. (2014). Participatory methods for measuring and monitoring governance. In Adaptive cross-scalar governance of natural resources (pp. 258-282). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315851693-26/participatory-methods-measuring-monitoring-governance-jennifer-arnold-wendy-lin-bartels
• Asase, A., Mzumara-Gawa, T. I., Owino, J. O., Peterson, A. C., & Saupe, E. E. (2021). Replacing “parachute science” with “global science” in ecology and conservation biology. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.517
• Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(39), 15188–15193. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702098104
• Beyond the Academy (2022). Edited by B.L. Keeler and C. Locke. Guidebook for the Engaged University: Best Practices for Reforming Systems of Reward, Fostering Engaged Leadership, and Promoting Action-Oriented Scholarship. Available: http://beyondtheacademynetwork.org/guidebook/
• Bhattacharya, K. (2016). The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic de/colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 309-321. doi:10.1177/1077800415615619
• Bhattacharya, K. (2021). Rejecting Labels and Colonization: In Exile From Post-Qualitative Approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420941049
• Brunet, N. M., Hickey, G. M., & Humphries, M. M. (2014). Understanding community-researcher partnerships in the natural sciences: A case study from the Arctic. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.09.001
• Campbell, J. (2002). A critical appraisal of participatory methods in development research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570110098046
• Campbell, L. M., & Vainio-Mattila, A. (2003). Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned?. Human ecology, 31, 417-437. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1025071822388
• Chambers, J., Wyborn, C., Ryan, M., Reid, R. S., Riechers, M., Serban, A., Bennett, N. J., Cvitanovic, C., Fernández-Giménez, M. E., Galvin, K., Goldstein, B. E., Klenk, N., Tengö, M., Brennan, R., Cockburn, J., Hill, R., Munera, C., Nel, J. L., Österblom, H., Pickering, T. (2021). Six modes of co-production for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4(11), 983–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
• Crane, J. (2020). Dreaming partnership, enabling inequality: administrative infrastructure in global health science. Africa, 90(1), 188–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001972019001001
• Cronkleton, P., Albornoz, M. A., Barnes, G., Evans, K. K., & De Jong, W. (2010). Social Geomatics: Participatory Forest Mapping to Mediate Resource Conflict in the Bolivian Amazon. Human Ecology, 38(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9296-4
• De Vos, A. (2020, July 1). The Problem of ‘Colonial Science.’ Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-of-colonial-science/
• De Vos, A., & Schwartz, M. W. (2022). Confronting parachute science in conservation. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12681
• Douglass, K., Morales, E. Q., Manahira, G., Fenomanana, F., Samba, R., Lahiniriko, F. & Robison, R. (2019). Toward a just and inclusive environmental archaeology of southwest Madagascar. Journal of Social Archaeology, 19(3), 307-332. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1469605319862072?casa_token=78GUPVQgYlgAAAAA:W8Zthic6lwPZK05Hzpy5Ti_KOj4IRlaifjOESjKa2i4qAHuDKwBHBADnulEiCnAQ0Sp5mogO48w
• Duchelle, A. E., Biedenweg, K., Lucas, C. A., Virapongse, A., Radachowsky, J., Wojcik, D. J., Londres, M., Bartels, W., Alvira, D., & Kainer, K. A. (2009). Graduate Students and Knowledge Exchange with Local Stakeholders: Possibilities and Preparation. Biotropica, 41(5), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00563.x
• Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Ballard, H. L., & Sturtevant, V. E. (2008). Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: a study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society, 13(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267955
• Firehock, K. (2003). Protocol and guidelines for ethical and effective research of community based collaborative processes. Tuscun: Community Based Collaboratives Research Consortium.
• Ford, J. K., Riley, S. J., Lauricella, T. K., & Van Fossen, J. A. (2020). Factors Affecting Trust Among Natural Resources Stakeholders, Partners, and Strategic Alliance Members: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Frontiers in Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00009
• Haelewaters, D., Hofmann, T. A., & Romero-Olivares, A. L. (2021). Ten simple rules for Global North researchers to stop perpetuating helicopter research in the Global South. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(8), e1009277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009277
• Helicopter research’ comes under fire at Cape Town conference. (2023, March 24). Science | AAAS. https://www.science.org/content/article/helicopter-research-comes-under-fire-cape-town-conference
• Horn, L., Alba, S., Gopalakrishna, G., Kleinert, S., Kombe, F., Lavery, J. V., & Visagie, R. G. (2023, March 24). The Cape Town Statement on fairness, equity and diversity in research. Nature News. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00855-y
• Kainer, K. A., DiGiano, M. L., Duchelle, A. E., Wadt, L. H., Bruna, E., & Dain, J. L. (2009). Partnering for greater success: local stakeholders and research in tropical biology and conservation. Biotropica, 41(5), 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00560.x
• Krystalli, R., Hoffecker, E., Leith, K., & Wilson, K. (2021). Taking the research experience seriously: a framework for reflexive applied research in development. Global Studies Quarterly, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab022
• Liverpool, L. (2021). Researchers from global south under-represented in development research. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02549-9
• Lynam, T., De Jong, W., Sheil, D., Kusumanto, T., & Evans, K. (2007). A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and society, 12(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267832
• Milner, N., Cunliffe, A., Jackman, A., Laumonier, Y., Lunstrum, E., Mulero-Pazmany, M., Paneque-Galvez, J., Sandbrook, C., & Wich, S. (n.d.). Responsible drone use in biodiversity conservation: Guidelines for environmental and conservation organisations who use drones. https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Flyer/8851-Flyer.pdf
• Meadow, A. M., Ferguson, D. M., Guido, Z., Horangic, A., Owen, G., & Wall, T. L. (2015). Moving toward the Deliberate Coproduction of Climate Science Knowledge. Weather, Climate, and Society, 7(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-14-00050.1
• Ni, C., Smith, E., Yuan, H., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2021). The gendered nature of authorship. Science advances, 7(36). https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.abe4639
• Ochocka, J., Moorlag, E., & Janzen, R. (2010). A framework for entry: PAR values and engagement strategies in community research. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 3, 1-19. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.938075381754015
• Odeny, B., & Bosurgi, R. (2022). Time to end parachute science. PLOS Medicine, 19(9), e1004099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004099
• The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science. (n.d.) Authorship Guidelines – The Ohio University. https://ccts.osu.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/osu_authorship_guidelines_0.pdf
• Parachute science falls to earth. (2021, April 13). Nature Index. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news-blog/parachute-science-falls-to-earth
• Parker, M., & Kingori, P. (2016). Good and bad research collaborations: researchers’ views on science and ethics in global health research. PloS one, 11(10), e0163579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163579
• Parrado-Rosselli, A. (2007). A collaborative research process studying fruit availability and seed dispersal within an indigenous community in the Middle Caquetá River region, Colombian Amazon. Ecology and Society, 12(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267887
• Perz, S. G., Arteaga, M., Baudoin Farah, A., Brown, I. F., Mendoza, E. R. H., de Paula, Y. A. P. & Selaya G, N. G. (2021). Participatory action research for conservation and development: Experiences from the Amazon. Sustainability, 14(1), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010233
• Picot, L., & Grasham, C. F. (n.d.). Code of Conduct for Ethical Fieldwork. https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/files/ethicalfieldworkcodeofconductpdf-1
• Putz, F. E. (2022, September). Helicopter Science. CFA Newsletter.
• Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Westeen, E. P., Frederick, J., Amini, S., Wait, D. R., Achmadi, A. S., Andayani, N., Arida, E., Arifin, U., Bernal, M. A., Bonaccorso, E., Sanguila, M. B., Brown, R. M., Che, J., Condori, F. P., Hartiningtias, D., Hiller, A. E., Iskandar, D. T., Jiménez, R. M., Tarvin, R. D. (2022). A set of principles and practical suggestions for equitable fieldwork in biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(34). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122667119
• Reed, M. J., Stringer, L. C., Fazey, I., Evely, A., & Kruijsen, J. (2014). Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021
• Setty, R. S., Bawa, K., Ticktin, T., & Gowda, C. M. (2008). Evaluation of a participatory resource monitoring system for nontimber forest products: the case of amla (Phyllanthus spp.) fruit harvest by Soligas in South India. Ecology and Society, 13(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268002
• Toomey, A. H. (2016). What happens at the gap between knowledge and practice? Spaces of encounter and misencounter between environmental scientists and local people. Ecology and Society, 21(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270380
• Toomey, A. H., Knight, A. T., & Barlow, J. (2017). Navigating the space between research and implementation in conservation. Conservation Letters, 10(5), 619-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12315
• Utset, E. (2024). Combating parachute science in Latin America through Indigenous agency. Conservation Biology, 38, e14217. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14217